| Validity of Jesus I |
[Aug. 19th, 2006|09:41 pm] |
The validity of Jesus is constantly being debated. Was he the son of God? Was he the literal son of God? How do you decipher son of God? Literally, Jesus would be God incarnated in a man, to spread his father’s joy. Literally, Jesus could’ve been a metaphor for the literal Sun, of God. Jesus symbolizes the Sun and the Sun symbolizes enlightenment. When searching for enlightenment, one seeks the Truth of All Things. Jesus simply stands for that divine truth. The Kingdom of Heaven is within. We’ll be confined to external projections of illusionary love until the opposite is realized, the Message. From any perspective, Jesus is valid, for his message is Truth. Literal Son, Literal Sun, or Literal Metaphor, the Truth is introduced.
The message of Jesus (Truth) can be applied to every system of belief, whether it is religion, science, or atheism. The religious aspect has been studied enough. Scientifically, the truth is, you must find the answers in or by yourself, which is what people generally do when they live by the scientific method. Atheism’s application of the message is similar. Most of them are skeptics and rely primarily if not exclusively on the scientific method and by the same token, they have to save themselves though that system. That system is their Jesus in the context of him representing that underlying message.
Need it not a name, its validity breathes regardless.
Cag-Omar, 2006.
|
|
|
| Introduction |
[Aug. 19th, 2006|05:25 pm] |
Welcome to the log of Cag-Omar.
If you're seeking Hermetic Gnosis or are interested in doing so, feel free to add me. Those who are researching Hermeticism and other Occult systems may also add me. I'm always up for debate and conversation. Anyone else who shares my other interests may also add me, but I suggest commenting on this introduction beforehand.
All Is.
Cag-Omar, 2006.
|
|
|
![[info]](http://l-stat.livejournal.com/img/userinfo.gif){kind=small}
nemus_contraho's journal